DIASPORA | US Supreme Court Tells Green Card Holders and the Caribbean Diaspora: You Are Not Safe

MONTEGO BAY / WASHINGTON | Calvin G. Brown, June 28, 2026 -   In the span of forty-eight hours last week, the United States Supreme Court handed Donald Trump’s administration two decisive victories that together redraw the map of belonging for millions of immigrants — and place the Caribbean diaspora squarely in the crosshairs.

A Lower Bar at the Border

On Tuesday, June 23, in a 6-3 ruling authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court in Blanche v. Lau gave border officers sweeping new latitude over returning green card holders.

The justices held that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not require officers to possess “clear and convincing evidence” that a lawful permanent resident committed a disqualifying crime before treating that person as an “applicant for admission” rather than a returning resident.

Thomas wrote that the statute demands only a “reason to believe” a qualifying offense occurred — not courtroom-level proof at the port of entry.

The distinction is technical but the stakes are not. A green card holder reclassified as an applicant for admission can be paroled into the country on a conditional basis rather than readmitted as a permanent resident, and funneled into removal proceedings that can drag on for years.

The case arose from a Chinese national, stopped at John F. Kennedy airport, who was linked to a criminal investigation. For the thousands of Jamaicans, Haitians, Trinidadians and other Caribbean nationals who travel home for funerals, weddings and family business, the ruling converts routine travel into legal jeopardy for anyone with so much as an unresolved charge.

In a scorching dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the majority had handed the government, in her words, a “massive blank check” to upend the status of returning residents so long as Washington can later show the person was eventually convicted. That sequencing, she argued, betrays the plain operation of the law itself.

Haiti in the Crosshairs

Two days later, the Court went further. On Thursday, June 25, a 6-3 majority in Mullin v. Doe cleared the way for the Department of Homeland Security to terminate Temporary Protected Status for roughly 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians.

The estimated 350,000 Haitians living in the United States under Temporary Protected Status should leave and can get a $2,600 bonus if they depart quickly instead of being deported, Trump administration officials said.

The Supreme Court on June 25 ruled President Donald Trump can end TPS for Haitians who sought sanctuary in the United States after natural disasters and political unrest in the Caribbean island nation. The ruling also covers about 6,000 people from Syria, which endured a devastating civil war from 2011 to 2024.

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito held that the TPS statute bars judicial review of nonconstitutional challenges to the secretary’s termination decisions — meaning courts are effectively powerless to police whether the administration even followed the law.

The human cost lands hardest on Haiti, a CARICOM member already drowning in catastrophe. The U.S. State Department itself keeps Haiti on its “do not travel” list, citing armed robbery, carjackings, kidnapping for ransom and a state of emergency in place since March 2024.

Sending people back, advocates say, is a death sentence. Late last year the administration deported four women to Haiti; in February their decapitated bodies were found in a river.

The Racism the Majority Would Not Name

What made Mullin extraordinary was the racial reckoning the majority refused to hold. Alito concluded that none of Trump’s or former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s statements about Haiti were “overtly racial,” and that the administration’s record of ending every TPS designation supplied a “strong, race-neutral explanation.” Justice Thomas went further in a concurrence, arguing that noncitizens have no equal protection rights against the federal government.

Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, refused to let the silence stand. She wrote that the plaintiffs’ evidence included presidential statements “so repellent and racially inflected” that the majority declined to put them in print — and then printed them herself.

She catalogued Trump branding Haiti a “shithole” country, claiming Haitians are “poisoning the blood” of America, and reviving his debunked 2024 smear that Haitians in Springfield, Ohio were abducting and eating pets. The statements, Kagan wrote, “fairly shout” that race shaped the decision to remove Haitians from the country.

A Region on Notice

For the wider region, the warning signs are flashing. Last year the Court permitted the administration to strip the same protections from 600,000 Venezuelans, and roughly 1.3 million people from 17 countries hold TPS today. The architecture that once shielded Caribbean nationals fleeing disaster is being dismantled, decision by decision, with the judiciary’s blessing.

The administration insists it is targeting the “worst of the worst.” The record tells another story: a campaign that converts a benefits agency into a deportation machine, lowers the evidentiary bar at the border, and shuts the courthouse door behind it.

For Caribbean families on both sides of the water, the message from Washington’s highest bench is unambiguous — permanent residence is no longer permanent, and protection is no longer protected.

-30-