HAITI'S Date With Democracy: CARICOM Envoys Warn the Road to December 13 Is Choked by Paperwork and Gunfire

After a decade without a vote, Haiti finally has an election date. The CARICOM Eminent Persons Group has just returned with a sobering message: the machinery meant to deliver it is grinding, and the date itself may not hold.

MONTEGO BAY, Jamaica, Calvin G Brown | September 15, 2026 - Haiti has a date with democracy. The question now being asked, politely but unmistakably, by the Caribbean’s own emissaries is whether Haiti can keep it.

In a statement issued on Monday from the CARICOM Secretariat in Georgetown, the CARICOM Eminent Persons Group (EPG) reported on a week-long mission to Haiti, from 2 to 9 September, that reads less like a progress report than a flashing amber light. The first round of presidential and legislative elections, alongside a constitutional referendum, is set for 13 December. It would be Haiti’s first national vote since 2016, when Jovenel Moïse won a presidency that ended with his assassination in July 2021.

The EPG credited Haitians with real progress in restarting an electoral process dormant for more than ten years, noting that parties are organising and forming alliances. But across meetings with political actors, business leaders, youth and women’s groups, human rights organisations, state institutions and the leadership of the Gang Suppression Force (GSF), the group heard the same refrain: the system built to deliver the vote is buckling.

A Decree That Weighs Heavy

At the centre of the complaints sits the amended Electoral Decree. Stakeholders told the EPG that many of its new measures are unwieldy and onerous, singling out the sheer volume of documents candidates must lodge with the Provisional Electoral Council (CEP). Several parties, while straining to comply, want procedures modified, changes that the EPG acknowledged could force the 13 December date to move.

Here lies an uncomfortable truth. Rules designed to weed out paper parties and guard against fraud can, if overbuilt, weed out legitimate contenders as well. According to CMC figures carried by the Gleaner, only 21 of 105 approved political organisations had met the requirement of 30,000 endorsements as of 3 September. Whether that is rigour or a bottleneck depends on where one stands, and in Haiti, where one stands may well be behind a gang barricade.

The Arithmetic of Registration

The EPG was told plainly that voter registration is not meeting expectations. The CEP’s own numbers bear that out. By 6 September, 506,953 people had registered since the drive opened on 20 July, just 12.6 per cent of the four-million target, with the window closing on 13 October.

To hit its target, the CEP would need to register roughly 94,000 Haitians a day for the next five weeks, about nine times the pace achieved so far.

That is not a shortfall. It is a chasm.

Where the State Cannot Reach

The EPG pointed to the root of the problem: registration is constricted by territories beyond state control. When the drive launched, the West Department, home to Port-au-Prince, was initially left out because of gang violence, with enrolment there beginning ten days later. A registration centre means little to a citizen who cannot safely walk to it.

Stakeholders pressed for greater public sensitisation and more registration centres. The government has signalled a civic education and voter-awareness campaign, but with the clock running, sensitisation delivered in November will not register a single voter in October.

The Postponement Dilemma

There is a genuine case on both sides. Delay the vote, and Haiti buys time to simplify rules, widen registration and let security catch up. Hold the line, and it avoids extending the rule of unelected authorities that has become a fixture of the crisis. The August 30 date has already been scrapped once; each slippage erodes public faith that any date is real.

The EPG captured the stakes precisely. Haitians, it said, yearn for elections that are fair, credible, impartial and inclusive, precisely to end the cycle of transitional arrangements. A rushed election that disenfranchises millions would satisfy the calendar and betray that yearning. An open-ended delay would betray it too.

The Security Promise Still Unkept

None of this can be separated from the guns. The EPG flagged a recent spread and spike in deadly violence and kidnappings, and the slow deployment of the GSF, the force authorised under UN Security Council Resolution 2793 with a ceiling of 5,550 personnel. That mandate is due to expire on 30 September unless renewed, and Haiti’s Foreign Minister Raina Forbin has urged the Council to extend it and secure full deployment.

Every stakeholder the EPG met agreed on one point: without security, there is no country-wide registration, no campaigning, no free movement and no safe ballot. The group called on international partners to deliver on their pledges “with despatch”.

That call should land hardest in Caribbean capitals. Jamaica and The Bahamas sit on the Standing Group of Partners steering the GSF. CARICOM has staked its credibility on a Haitian-led return to constitutional order. If 13 December slips, it must be because the rules were fixed and the streets were made safe, not because the world once again promised more than it delivered.

Haiti is, as the EPG put it, at a critical juncture. The region cannot afford to look away from it.

— 30 —