JAMAICA | Caribbean Court Challenge Throws Gaza Crisis Into CARICOM Summit Spotlight

MONTEGO BAY, Jamaica, July 5, 2025 - Just hours before Caribbean leaders descend on Montego Bay for a most significant regional summit, a groundbreaking legal challenge in Barbados threatens to thrust the Gaza crisis to the center of Caribbean Community deliberations—alongside the festering wound of Haiti's collapse—exposing uncomfortable contradictions in the region's foreign policy.

In a landmark moment for regional justice and international law, the Caribbean Movement for Peace and Integration has filed a powerful legal challenge before the Supreme Court of Barbados, calling for urgent national action in response to what it terms Israel's ongoing atrocities in Gaza.

The timing is no coincidence. As the 49th CARICOM Heads of Government Meeting convenes Sunday through Tuesday at the Montego Bay Convention Centre, the legal action presents regional leaders with an unavoidable moral reckoning at a time when the Caribbean community faces its gravest challenges in decades.

Six Bold Declarations That Could Reshape Policy

The legal filing, brought by CMPI Secretary David McDonald Denny and led by veteran human rights attorney Lalu Hanuman—Secretary of the Caribbean Against Apartheid in Palestine—seeks six core declarations from the Supreme Court that would fundamentally alter how Caribbean nations engage with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The case lays claims against Barbados's Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Immigration Department, and the Attorney General, demanding that Israel be formally recognized as committing genocide in Gaza, having committed war crimes, being guilty of crimes against humanity, and operating an apartheid regime against the Palestinian people.

Most significantly, the plaintiffs seek court orders requiring rigorous screening of Israeli passport holders at all Barbadian ports of entry, with immediate prosecution or deportation of anyone suspected of involvement in genocide, war crimes, or crimes against humanity—regardless of diplomatic status.

"If prosecution is not feasible, immediate deportation must be enacted, even in the case of diplomatic personnel," the legal challenge states, potentially setting precedent across the Caribbean.

A Region's Moral Compass Points Multiple Directions

Justice Dr. Herbert Patrick Wells, who presided over the hearing, emphasized the urgency and international gravity of the matter, ordering the case to proceed expeditiously given the accelerating humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Members of the Caribbean Against Apartheid in Palestine were present in court in solidarity, alongside students from the University of the West Indies Faculty of Law, underscoring the educational significance for emerging Caribbean jurists.

Yet as CARICOM leaders prepare to grapple with this moral challenge, they face an equally vexing crisis closer to home. Haiti, once the Caribbean's revolutionary beacon, has more or less become a failed state, presenting the community with a different kind of accountability question—whether regional integration means anything when a founding member descends into chaos.

The juxtaposition is stark: while Caribbean activists demand their governments take bold stands against atrocities thousands of miles away, the region's backyard burns with gang violence, political collapse, and humanitarian disaster that has displaced hundreds of thousands of Haitians.

From Gaza to Port-au-Prince: The Weight of Justice

David McDonald Denny frames both crises in terms that resonate across the Caribbean's anti-colonial history. "Barbados and CARICOM stood at the forefront of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa," Denny declares. "We cannot now turn a blind eye to a modern-day apartheid and genocide. To remain silent, or worse, to maintain 'business as usual' with Israel, is not neutrality—it is complicity."

But critics might ask whether this moral clarity extends to Haiti, where CARICOM's response has been cautious, diplomatic, and largely ineffective as the country spirals deeper into lawlessness.

Attorney Hanuman frames the Gaza legal challenge as constitutional necessity. "If the Director of Public Prosecutions fails to act, that inaction itself becomes unconstitutional. It violates Article 11 of our Constitution and endangers our legal and moral credibility."

The same constitutional principles could theoretically apply to Haiti, where documented human rights violations by gangs and their political enablers continue unchecked, yet no similar legal challenges demand Caribbean governments act decisively.

The Numbers Behind Moral Urgency

The human toll driving the Barbados legal action defies comprehension. At least 57,268 Palestinians have been killed, mostly women and children, and another 135,625 individuals injured in the brutal Israeli onslaught on Gaza since October 7, 2023. The case references overwhelming global evidence from multiple international bodies, including Amnesty International, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and UN agencies, identifying Israel as responsible for atrocity crimes through what activists call the weaponization of famine.

According to documentation cited in the legal filing, UNICEF spokesperson James Elder reported that Gaza is experiencing "daily atrocities," with thousands of children dying from hunger and dehydration due to the blockade of essential aid and fuel. UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine Francesca Albanese has warned that the systematic violence since October 7 represents part of a broader campaign of forced displacement and population erasure.

Meanwhile, Haiti's crisis generates less international attention despite equally staggering statistics: over 200,000 internally displaced persons, thousands killed in gang violence, and a humanitarian catastrophe that has rendered large swaths of the country ungovernable.

CARICOM's Evolving Palestinian Position

The court challenge emerges against a backdrop of shifting Caribbean positions on Palestine. As of May 7, 2024, all 14 CARICOM states now recognize Palestine as a State, representing a dramatic alignment after years of individual deliberations influenced by U.S. pressure.

On Tuesday, 2 July, the Caribbean Community and the State of Palestine marked a significant milestone in their diplomatic relations with the accreditation of Palestine's first Ambassador to CARICOM. CARICOM Secretary-General Dr. Carla Barnett used the virtual ceremony to deliver some of the community's strongest language yet on the conflict.

"We strongly urge an end to the illegal settlement of the occupied Palestinian Territories, a clear violation of international law," Dr. Barnett stated. "The Community's repeated message is clear: there must be an unconditional and sustained ceasefire, protection of civilian lives, and unimpeded humanitarian aid in Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian Territories."

Yet recognition of Palestine as a state and diplomatic condemnations represent only the beginning of what activists demand. The Barbados case challenges CARICOM nations to move from rhetoric to concrete action—potentially including prosecution of war criminals and suspension of diplomatic relations.

Legal Precedent Meets Political Reality

The Barbados case operates on solid legal foundations. As signatories to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN Charter, Genocide Convention, and Geneva Conventions, Caribbean nations possess both the authority and obligation to act against war crimes under universal jurisdiction principles.

However, political realities complicate moral imperatives. Caribbean nations maintain complex relationships with both Israel and the United States, which continues to oppose Palestinian statehood and pressure allies against recognizing Palestinian sovereignty. Recent U.S. diplomatic cables warn countries attending UN conferences on two-state solutions that they could face diplomatic consequences, illustrating the pressure Caribbean nations face.

The Haiti crisis adds another layer of complexity. How can CARICOM demand international accountability for Gaza while struggling to address state failure in their own community? The contradiction isn't lost on regional observers who note the community's limited leverage in both situations.

A Summit's Unscripted Agenda

The 49th meeting of Caribbean Community heads of government will focus on issues like climate, trade, and security, with the meeting covering topics such as transportation, telecoms, tourism digitalization, security, climate funding, food and nutrition, trade deals, and the crisis in Haiti.

The inclusion of Haiti on the official agenda acknowledges what regional leaders can no longer ignore: the Caribbean's founding revolutionary state has become a cautionary tale of failed governance and international neglect.

Prime Minister Andrew Holness assumes the six-month rotating Chairmanship of the Community on 1 July 2025, positioning Jamaica to shape CARICOM's response to both the Gaza legal challenge and the Haitian catastrophe.

The Barbados legal challenge ensures that Palestinian solidarity cannot remain a comfortable abstraction, while Haiti's presence on the agenda forces confrontation with uncomfortable questions about regional solidarity when member states collapse.

Protest organizers have already attempted to raise "Free Gaza" banners in Montego Bay, though Mayor Vernon says the posters were taken down because they were erected illegally, highlighting the intersection of local politics and international solidarity.

The Mandela Test in Multiple Dimensions

The Caribbean Movement for Peace and Integration calls upon CARICOM leaders to break their silence and take collective diplomatic action to hold Israel accountable. "We are duty-bound by the same moral compass that once guided us in the struggle against apartheid," said Denny. "Today, we must honor that legacy by defending the dignity and rights of the Palestinian people. To do less is to betray our history—and our humanity."

Denny concludes by quoting Nelson Mandela: "We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians"—a reminder that the global struggle for justice knows no borders.

Yet the Mandela test applies equally to Haiti, where Caribbean freedom remains incomplete as long as a founding member state languishes in chaos. The moral courage that once challenged South African apartheid now faces dual tests: Palestinian suffering abroad and Haitian collapse at home.

Competing Urgencies, Common Challenges

As delegates arrive in Jamaica's tourism capital, they carry more than summit agendas. They bear the weight of Caribbean moral tradition and the expectations of movements demanding accountability—whether for Gaza's genocide or Haiti's governance failure.

The next hearing in the Barbados case is scheduled for July 21st, just two weeks after the Montego Bay summit concludes. By then, CARICOM leaders will have decided whether their community leads on international justice or follows more cautious diplomatic paths—and whether moral leadership extends to uncomfortable truths about regional dysfunction.

The legal challenge represents "a demand for accountability, justice, and the enforcement of both domestic constitutional protections and international humanitarian law," as the original filing states. "It is a call for Barbados to lead the region once again, as it did during the fight to dismantle apartheid."

Whether that leadership extends to addressing state failure in Haiti—or remains focused on distant injustices—may determine CARICOM's credibility as a force for justice in an increasingly complex world.

The question facing Caribbean leaders isn't simply whether they support Palestinian rights or Haitian sovereignty in principle—both debates have been settled. The question is whether they possess the courage and capacity to transform moral conviction into meaningful action when faced with competing crises that test the very foundations of regional solidarity.

In Montego Bay's convention halls, where tourism and trade typically dominate conversation, discussions of universal jurisdiction, war crimes prosecution, and state failure present an uncomfortable reckoning with the gap between Caribbean aspirations and Caribbean realities.

The 49th CARICOM Heads of Government Meeting continues through Tuesday, July 8th. The Barbados Supreme Court case resumes July 21st.

-30-