JAMAICA | Remove Yu Brand! Brown Burke Demands PM's Name Plaques Come Off the Homes of the Poor

Opposition Spokesperson Dr Angela Brown Burke says permanent plaques bearing the Prime Minister's name on New Social Housing Programme homes trade the dignity of poor Jamaicans for political promotion — and demands they come down.

KINGSTON, Jamaica, July 24, 2026 — The homes were meant to shelter Jamaica's most vulnerable. Instead, says the Opposition, they have been pressed into service as campaign hoardings — each one carrying a permanent plaque bearing the name of the Prime Minister who handed it over.

Dr Angela Brown Burke, Opposition Spokesperson on Social Protection and Social Transformation, on Thursday condemned the Government's practice of affixing the personalised plaques to houses built under the New Social Housing Programme (NSHP), branding it a dehumanising act that trades the dignity of poor Jamaicans for political promotion.

“Every Jamaican deserves a safe roof over their head. But no Jamaican should have to pay for that roof with their privacy and dignity,” the St Andrew South Western MP declared. “A home is a place of refuge, pride, and peace. It is not, and should never be, a billboard. Yet that is exactly what this Government has turned these homes into: a permanent advertisement announcing that the people inside were once in need.”

Whose Money, Whose Name?

At the centre of Brown Burke's charge is a simple question of ownership. The NSHP, launched in 2018 as the housing component of the Government's Housing, Opportunity, Production and Employment (HOPE) initiative, is financed entirely from the public purse.

It is targeted at the estimated 6,000 households the Prime Minister himself has described as living in the worst conditions anywhere in Jamaica.

Indeed, Prime Minister Andrew Holness has been at pains to make that very point. Handing over a unit in Lacovia, St Elizabeth, in January 2024, he reminded the gathering that although the houses are delivered at no cost to beneficiaries, they are not free — they come from the Jamaican taxpayers.

Which is precisely the Opposition's point.

“When you put one person's name on a house paid for by all of us, you send a dangerous message. You tell struggling families that they should be personally grateful to an individual, instead of being assured of their right as citizens.”— Dr Angela Brown Burke, MP

Marked for Life

The deeper injury, the Opposition Spokesperson argued, is what the plaques do to the people who must live behind them. “Worse, you mark them,” she said. “You expose vulnerable mothers, children, and elders to stigma and public scrutiny for the rest of their lives. That is not social protection. That is branding.”

The irony is difficult to miss. Dignity has been the Government's own watchword for the programme. As recently as June, the Prime Minister was hailing the NSHP as delivering “not only shelter but also dignity and hope” to the nation's most vulnerable, calling it the most transformative initiative in Jamaica's fight against poverty.

But a plaque, Brown Burke countered, tells a different story — one in which a family's hardest season is bolted to the front wall in perpetuity, while the credit is reserved for a single politician.

Service or Campaigning?

Brown Burke warned that the practice blurs the line between public service and political campaigning — a line the Caribbean has long struggled to police. Across the region, the politics of the handout has too often converted citizens' entitlements into instruments of partisan loyalty.

Permanent plaques on the homes of the poor, the Opposition contends, carry that tradition to a new and troubling frontier: the beneficiary's own doorstep.

The Opposition is demanding that the Government immediately remove the existing personalised plaques from beneficiaries' homes, discontinue the practice permanently, and adopt a policy that recognises national projects in a way that upholds — rather than undermines — the dignity of the people they serve.

Up to publication time, neither the Office of the Prime Minister nor the ministry with responsibility for the programme had responded publicly to the Opposition's demands.

“Social protection must empower, not embarrass. It must lift people up, not label them,” Brown Burke concluded. “Jamaica deserves better. Our people deserve better. Dignity is not negotiable.”

The plaques themselves are small. The question they fix to every wall is not: in the Jamaica of 2026, is a roof over one's head the right of a citizen — or a favour, signed and dated, awaiting repayment at the ballot box?

— 30 —